NYT literally reports that “greening” the Earth with CO2 is a terrible thing

The mask is coming off. The climate change alarmists in the mainstream media are revealing their true motives. A new report authored by Carl Zimmer of the New York Times suggests that the process of “greening” the Earth with CO2 is a terrible thing that must be reversed. The article claims that “global greening” from carbon dioxide emissions is “terrible” in the long run. Plants should not be allowed to grow freely with an abundant supply of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Obviously, the fight against “climate change” is really a deceptive plot to eradicate a necessary element so that plant life is starved and the planet becomes void of life. Climate change alarmists have made carbon dioxide out to be some kind of pollutant, even though it contains two of the most important molecules for life itself. If carbon levels were reduced to near zero, the planet would become cold and/or arid, barren, depopulated, starved of nutrients, food variety, and ultimately cut short of oxygen. This is the kind of planet that Carl Zimmer is advocating for?

Why do they try to make it a bad thing?

The fight against “climate change” is also a plot to engineer a reason to manipulate and change the Earth’s climate in ways that benefit specific industries, in ways that control the population. The natural rise in atmospheric CO2 is helpful for plant growth, which ultimately spurs food production and the return of oxygen to the atmosphere. However, Carl Zimmer of the New York Times wrote on July 30th that “rising CO2 levels are making the world greener, but that’s nothing to celebrate.” [emphasis added] Zimmer advocates for tight controls on CO2 emissions so that climate can be manipulated and controlled. Climate change alarmist like Zimmer are actually pro “climate change” because they want to manipulate the Earth’s climate how they best deem fit.

The backwards-thinking Zimmer doesn’t want to see plants thriving where they once struggled. Because of rising CO2 levels in the past century, plants grew at a faster rate than any other time in the past 54,000 years. This has brought incredible abundance of life and ecosystems. Anyone that disagrees with Zimmer is viewed as a “climate denialist” who is trying to impede “scientific progress.”

Others have embraced the idea of rising CO2 levels because it would naturally help the planet re-green. Former Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore argues that the world needs more CO2. The Earth is theoretically CO2-deficient compared to past geological periods, when plant life exploded. Moore criticized Zimmer and the New York Times for their claims. Moore writes that CO2 levels should be higher: “800-1200 ppm CO2 is optimal. It has been lower during Pleistocene than any time in Earth history.” It’s also a known fact that plants see tremendous growth when CO2 is pumped into a greenhouse.

Since plants synthesize their own medicines, one very important element is needed to form bonds for the production of phyto-chemicals and vitamins. Vitamin C, for example, is created from hydrogen and oxygen, all held together by carbon bonds. Carbon is so common in chemistry it is not even denoted in molecular formulas. The leaves, stems, fruit, bark, and nutritive compounds that come from plant life all depend upon the utilization of carbon dioxide from the Earth’s atmosphere. The nefarious war against carbon is not only a war against food diversity, independence and abundance, but it is also a war against natural medicine, nutrition, and healing super foods.

For more analysis on climate change, visit ClimateScienceNews.com.

Sources include:



comments powered by Disqus